More and more each day. And I’m starting to trust reason less and less.
PROMPT: Instincts
Reply
Author Archives: B Gourley
Autumn Light [Haiku]
breeze-twisted leaves
catch the sunlight of an
Autumn afternoon.
Share on Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc.
DAILY PHOTO: Rail Corridor, Atlanta
Share on Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc.
BOOKS: “Funny Stuff” ed. by Laura LaPlaca and Ryan Lintelman
Funny Stuff: How Comedy Shaped American History by Laura LaPlacaMy rating: 4 of 5 stars
Publisher Site — Rutgers University Press
Release Date: May 12, 2026
As the subtitle suggests, this book explores the nexus between American History and comedy across many, varied media (i.e. writing, theater, standup, improv, radio, television, movies, etc.) It’s an interesting book, but I don’t know that it has the right title. Considering the title, a reader might expect a fuller coverage of American History, drawing on whatever humorous outlets existed at the time (e.g. op-eds and satirical articles.) This book is more of a history of comedic content in the US with a substantial discussion of how comedy addressed / participated in changing views on sex, race, and sexuality and with occasional mention of how comedy was involved in other social issues, such as changing views on free speech and expression. You’re not going to learn how comedic writers addressed Smoot-Hawley or the Sinking of the Maine. (i.e. The book leads with comedic content and leans the discussion toward societal influence [rarely toward policy influence.] It does not lead with historical events and draw on appropriate comedic content.)
The book covers a lot of the same ground as Kliph Nesteroff’s The Comedians, though with quite different emphases. Nesteroff focuses on the gritty underside of comedy and the oft unseen dark side of comedians, while this book focuses on comedy as a factor in changing views on race and sex [as well as on the changing technological outlets for comedy.] Funny Stuff does spend a little more time on pre-20th century America than does Nesteroff, but not much more. Both books are heavily weighted toward the late 20th century to present. To be fair, there is much more volume of comedic output in this period. (That said, there were artists I expected coverage of, e.g. Josh Billings, that weren’t included. That’s where the book seems more like a history of comedy and its varied outlets.)
If you’re interested in the development of comedy in America, and its influence on social issues — most extensively attitudes towards race — I’d recommend this book.
View all my reviews
Share on Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc.
PROMPT: Favorite Month
Northern or Southern hemisphere? Landlocked or coastal? Temperate or Equatorial? I need more information.
Share on Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc.
Autumn Passing [Haiku]
each passing day
more yellow carpets the ground,
more blue shows through.
Share on Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc.
DAILY PHOTO: Clara Meer Dock
Share on Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc.
BOOKS: “The Activist” by Daniel Fried
The Activist: A Daoist Protest Manual by Daniel FriedMy rating: 4 of 5 stars
Publisher Page — Prometheus Books/
Release date: March 3, 2026
Taoist philosophy has been applied to many a subject over the centuries, from war to business to governance to relationships, but this is the first time I’ve seen it applied to activism in a substantive way. The book caught my eye because I’ve long recognized the central truth behind Fried’s work, which is that the tactics and mindsets of protesters often does them no favors and may even ensure failure (if one presumes the objective to be to change behavior and attitudes on a given topic into line with the protesters’ stance.) The problem is that protesters are often angry and combative, characteristics which may keep the choir (preaching to itself) warm and feeling self-righteous, but which seldom brings in new converts from among the undecided [let alone from the opposing side.] And if you didn’t need converts to your side, you wouldn’t have to protest in the first place. Given this tendency, Taoism could be argued to be an ideal source of strategy. Taoism proposes going with the grain, not leading with a fight, and avoiding useless activity.
This book provides interesting food-for-thought about how protesters might have more impact by adopting fewer belligerent and self-serving tactics. Unfortunately, the book also has stretches of stream-of-consciousness writing that — while perhaps consistent with the Taoist love of spontaneity — can be a bit of a strain on the reader’s ability to follow. This mostly takes place in the latter chapters.
I found this book to be intriguing. I can’t say that I came away from it having answered the question of whether Taoist philosophy is reconcilable with activism on a practical level. Taoism asks one to let the natural unfold, while protest movements want to guide a society in a particular direction (notably one by definition at odds which that which has fallen into place organically.) It’s not for lack of discussion that I haven’t reached a conclusion, but rather that questions remain for me on the pragmatic level (rather than the level of theory.) That said, I found the book well worth reading, despite a few points of low readability.
View all my reviews
Share on Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc.
PROMPT: Favorite Place
The park. (Works no matter what city one might consider “my city.”)
Share on Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc.
DAILY PHOTO: Scenes from Freedom Park, Atlanta
Tiger Riding for Beginners 