growing upward, the tree turns ninety degrees, reaching sideways three times its height - i jump to check gravity
Gravity-free Tree [Tanka]
1
Author Archives: B Gourley
DAILY PHOTO: Hanuman Temple, Kadri
River Meets Sea [Tanka]
wide mouth river, its chocolate-colored waters smashed by breakers / the battle is ceaseless; no winner is declared
Share on Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc.
Looming Clouds [Haiku]
DAILY PHOTO: St. Aloysius Church, Mangalore
Share on Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc.
Dog Pile [Haiku]
DAILY PHOTO: Mayo Hall, Bangalore
Share on Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc.
BOOK REVIEW: (Mis)Diagnosed by Jonathan Foiles
(Mis)Diagnosed: How Bias Distorts Our Perception of Mental Health by Jonathan FoilesMy rating: 4 of 5 stars
Amazon.in Page
Out: September 7, 2021
I’m fascinated by the challenges of mental health diagnostics. From the Rosenhan experiments (mentally well researchers checked into psychiatric hospitals) to the perpetual disappointment with new editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM,) a lot has been written about the difficulties of diagnosing disorders that largely express themselves through subjective experiences. Foiles’ book looks at how this challenge (combined race, gender, and gender identity biases) leads to differential diagnoses between various demographic groups.
The book serves as a call to action to be more aware of biases, and how they play into diagnoses. Though, in some cases it does a better job of that than in others. The six chapters present six faces of the problem: race and psychosis, race and ADHD [Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder,] sex and Borderline Personality Disorder, and changing (though skewed) views of gender dysphoria, trauma, and intelligence.
Overall, I felt I learned something from the book, but sometimes it wasn’t as strong in supporting assertions and objectively presenting evidence as other times. For example, Chapter three examines how borderline personality disorder was (at least until recently) overwhelming seen as a female disorder. It went on to say that now it’s believed to have the same incidence in males, but that men present with different symptoms. To a neophyte, this sounds a lot like: “The Smiths eat meatloaf 50% of the time for dinner on Wednesday. Until recently, it was thought that the Joneses only ate meatloaf 10% of Wednesdays, but then it was discovered they also had meatloaf 50% of the time – but the Joneses meatloaf was made of ingredients such that it usually looked like chicken pot pie.] What?
For the most part, I found this book intriguing and informative, and would recommend it for those interested in the issue.
View all my reviews
Share on Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc.
DAILY PHOTO: Giraffing to the Max
Share on Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc.
BOOK REVIEW: Hansel and Greta by Jeanette Winterson
Hansel and Greta: A Fairy Tale Revolution by Jeanette WintersonMy rating: 3 of 5 stars
Amazon.in Page
This story takes a green twist on the similarly named Brothers Grimm fairy tale. Being such a beloved classic, it seems like it would be hard to mess up an environmentally friendly re-telling, and yet it succeeds [in messing it up.] It’s true to its subtitle, “A Fairy Tale Revolution,” being – in part – fairy tale and – in part – the kind of vitriolic villainization of out-group members that one sees in the diatribes of political revolutionaries.
In one of the only non-rant departures from the original story, the witch is made a good character. This might be viewed as a progressive and charitable turn of the story were it not for the fact that the author just – unconsciously or consciously – shifts villainization over to another group: fat people. In the story, fat characters not only consume more food, they are in every way materialistic, gluttonous, and environmentally hateful — as opposed to the skinny in-group who aren’t at all part of the problem. This us-them tribalization is particularly unproductive in dealing with environmental problems because we are all part of the problem, and we all need to be engaged.
I don’t know whether Winterson got caught up in her own ideological anger, or whether she thought young readers need to have the issue oversimplified and the villains made over-the-top. It seems to me like reading Silverstein’s “The Giving Tree” results in kids wanting to plant trees and be more aware of how they use natural resources. Reading this book is more likely to make the child want to slap food out of a fat kid’s hands and shame him for his gluttony.
I can’t really recommend this book for kids. It’s more for parents who want their kids to know how to virtue signal than to be thoughtful about using resources.
View all my reviews
