BOOKS: Bohemians: A Very Short Introduction by David Weir

Bohemians: A Very Short Introduction (VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS)Bohemians: A Very Short Introduction by David Weir
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Amazon.in Page

This book examines the brief life of the Bohemian artistic lifestyle, exploring how it came about, what it looked like in its heyday, what led to its demise, and by what / whom it was replaced (e.g. the Beats.) It is an intriguing examination of the subject. I will say, there were points that I felt the book had become lost in the weeds, but at other points I found it fascinating. I concluded that my own calculus was to find it interesting when it discussed the lives and works of artists who are still deemed to have relevance and influence today (e.g. Baudelaire, Picasso, and Whitman,) and not so much when it was elaborating on artists and works that have fallen into obscurity among the general populace (e.g. Henry Murger’s Scenes of Bohemian Life.) So, that may be more a reflection on me than on the book.

The author touches upon the fictional influences that inspired Bohemianism, the places where the lifestyle thrived (e.g. Paris and New York,) the philosophy and – particularly – the political philosophy of the Bohemians (e.g. often Anarchists or – at least – anti-government.) One of the topics that most interested me is how the successor artistic communities differed from the Bohemians.

If you’re interested in who the Bohemians were and how they differ from other artistic communities (before and after,) this book is well worth the brief read required.

View all my reviews

Anarchy [Free Verse]

Anarchy
evokes
chicken body 
bumper cars.

Constant movement
that is not only 
undirected, but also:
fast,
violent,
random,
chaotic,
and doomed to be 
short-lived.

Anarchy 
seems like space 
in which
many participants
would soon be
on their backs --
legs churning 
in spastic bursts,
ineffectually.

Like toppled robots
or 
cockroaches that
waded through
gassy trenches.

Limbs moving,
as if confident 
that they can 
right the ship
and
recover the upright.

But everyone watching
knows they can't --
that the laws of physics
won't support it,
that it's just wasted
motion.

They might as well be
in night terrors,
for being able to move 
ineffectually seems 
only moderately less 
terrifying than not
being able to move at all --
when faced with a situation
from which one wants badly 
to get away.

But, maybe,
I've got it all wrong.

Maybe that's not 
Anarchy 
at all.